For some reason or another, stolen bases do not count as
total bases in the game of baseball. How many times have announcer said something to the effect of: "Don't let (
Figgins, Crawford,
Ichiro,
Rickey,
Soriano, etc.) get on base, he can turn a (single, walk) into a double without a problem,"? If you watch baseball as much as I do, or even one third as much as I do, you've heard it a thousand times. To me, it's always been logical that a stolen base should count as a TOTAL BASE. I understand you use total bases to calculate the ever-important slugging percentage, but that figure should be called something else.
My argument is that total bases should count as every base you get, on your own accord. Base knocks, two
baggers, triples and
dingers already count in the TB column, but so should steals and if we want to define total in its truest form, so should walks, fielder's choices, bases reached on error and even the freak
occurrences when a guy strikes out on a dropped third strike and gets to first. Faster guys are hurt in the traditional definition of this stat because their speed does not factor in. As the saying we started off with goes, the right guy can, "turn a single into a double." Shouldn't he be credited for one? Rickey Henderson, the greatest of all time -at least according to Rickey - is
35th all time in TB with 4,588 (and will be 37
th soon as A-Rod is tied with him and Manny's just 13 back) but if we add in his 1,406 steals, we get a new total of 5,994 which puts him 4
th.
NOT SO FAST MY FRIEND! If I'm giving an extra base for stealing one, you're gosh darn right I'm taking one away for getting thrown out, so before we add up Rickey's new total base number, let's remove 335 from that number for a final of 5,659/8
th place. Still very impressive and earned in my book.
The point of the inclusion of steals in the TB count is to measure a player's offensive effectiveness, not to diminish more powerful, slower players. I feel it's only fair to give love to the speedsters who are making up for their puny, girly muscles with good first steps and fast feet.
Here are two other stats, while not as groundbreaking as defensive range or OPS, I'd still like to see mentioned every so often (Glossary: Runs, Appearances, Runs Batted In, Home Runs):
RPA (runs per appearance): R/A = RPA
Along with ERA, I few this as another effective way to judge a pitchers effectiveness. While ERA is still probably a better gauge for starters, this gives the fan a better idea of a relief pitchers merit (especially a specialist). One bad outing by a guy who only pitches an inning or so each game will ruin his ERA for the year.
Myers has an awful appearance early in the season giving up six runs while just getting two outs in a game his Tigers ended up losing by 14. His ERA balloons to the Wang-ish 32.40 and will never get down to a respectable level again. Average fans take a look at his ERA, which at the All-Star Break is still over 6.00 and think he's a scrub. At the end of the year, Myers has pitched in 71 games and has an ERA of 5.23. Because of his third game of the season his numbers look terrible, when in actuality, he had a good year. Remove that appearance and his ERA drops practically one and a half runs. To give fans the best look at his season, we insert this stat into the mix and see that his RPA is just .34, a respectable number, considering 2009 Mariano Rivera's RPA is just a shade under .30 and his ERA is 2.61, practically perfectly half 1999 Myers'.
RC (runs created): R + RBI - HR = RC
Also known as Runs Responsible For
Obviously it was time to make an argument for a Yank. In 2006, Justin
Morneau edged out Derek
Jeter for the AL MVP by 14 votes. As it often does, the MVP that year went to the guy with the bigger power numbers as
Morneau had 34
HRs and 130 RBI to
Jeter's 14/97. Before a pitch was thrown that season, any pundit could have predicted the Twins first baseman would have
outslugged Jeter because for the bulk of the year,
Morneau batted 5
th, a classic RBI slot.
Jeter, on the
otherhand as he has for his entire career (excluding 2009), batted 2
nd where his job was to get on base and score, so of course he won't have the pop in his classic production stats as
Morneau did. Using this statistic, let's take a look at how many runs each player brought to their team (I don't have the data or time to factor in runners advanced, extra bases taken on throws, etc.).
Jeter had 97 RBI and 118 runs with just 14 homers resulting in an RC of 201.
Morneau was good for the aforementioned 130 RBI to go with 97 runs and 34
dingers for an RC of 193. Suddenly,
Jeter's numbers are slightly more impressive when you don't factor in the
longball. A
leadoff or #2 hitter will rarely get big power numbers (except when you take steroids like
Brady Anderson) because it just isn't their job, but that does not mean they are any less effective or vital to a club's success.
*(note: HRs are subtracted in this stat because they count for an RBI and a run in the player's stats, but only one run on the field)
The other Meatball promised me this week he shall make a triumphant return, so keep your eyes peeled ladies and gents.
-Jesse