Wednesday, April 20, 2011
Rock Paper Scissors is NOT a Sport
Monday, April 18, 2011
Rock, Paper Scissors is a Complicated Sport [Mondays with Gus]
Most people that hear me talk about Rock, Paper Scissors think I'm joking around. I, like many others are not. While I may not be a card carrying member of the World RPS Society, I do take this sport very seriously. It's more complicated than most people think, so I've taken the time to give you a little insight in the mind of a real RPS strategist.
First, let's get some of the basics out of the way. “Why does paper cover rock?” you might ask. The roots of rock and paper go beyond just the end product. Paper derives from trees. If a tree manages to plant it's seed (tough to say that in a serious, actual seed conversation kind of way) in a rock, the roots will break through the rock. Trees destroy rocks, hence paper wins.
You can also look at this game in the philosophical way. It's nature (rock) battling the end-product of man's attempt to use nature for his benefit (paper) while they both fight the corporatism that is the raping of nature in a non-sustainable way (metal, scissors). A little intense? Sure. But, the point is to show you that the game is much more complex than most of us will choose to admit.
RPS is very much a psychological game as well. Let's use Jersey Shore to demonstrate. If Ronnie and The Situation were to play, they would likely throw rock first. Why? Rock is an aggressive throw usually used by people who are either threatened or want to be intimidating. Workout freaks like Ronnie (called Meatsticks) LOVE rock. JWOW would likely throw scissors. Scissors is usually thrown by people who are arrogant or confident. Paper is thrown by the bureaucrats; people who are quiet and timid. Think Sammie Sweatheart. She loves to act quiet and timid, when in reality... You get it.
Is it really a sport? I've heard great arguments on both sides of the aisle. Dictionary.com defines a sport as “An athletic activity requiring skill or physical prowess and often of a competitive nature.” I will say this, in it's defense, this sport requires some serious physical prowess. Try throwing down about 250 rounds, best two out of three per round. It requires skill in that you can read your opponents throws and see if they twitch their pointer finger (sure fire scissors), or twist their wrist (sure fire paper).
I would argue that it is a sport, but I would love to hear arguments to the contrary.
-Gus Rafeedie
Editor's note: I will be blog-battling Gus on the topic later this week. Stay tuned.
Friday, April 15, 2011
NBA First Round Playoff Picks
Tuesday, April 12, 2011
NHL First Round Playoff Picks
I Still Love Manny Ramirez [Mondays with Gus]
Warning to all readers expecting a rational argument for why I love Manny Ramirez: it's not going to happen.
I'm sure all of us sports fans have the one thing that we argue that makes us sound like an idiot when discussing it with others, and this one is mine. I love Manny for the same reason many people hate him, I love to see “Manny being Manny.” In a sports world filled with cliché statements, public relations, and image consultants there is just something refreshing about how little Manny cares about any of it.
I had the great opportunity to meet Manny when I was 11. I was at a function where you could meet Cleveland Indians players. I ran passed Kenny Lofton and Eddie Murray and went straight for Manny. I heard Eddie Murray say to a kid “This ain't no time for autographs! Get out of here!” Ignoring his use of a double negative for just a moment, his behavior was irrational because he was at an autograph session. Hearing that, I still went to Manny who said to the same boy “I don't care. Gimme your card, kid.” I will never know if he really thought he was breaking the rules for that kid, or if he was just trying to make himself look good by showing what an ass Eddie Murray is.
When he left Cleveland to sign a similar contract with Boston, he was asked why he left for a few million dollars on a $100+ million contract. He answered that he would never spend that amount of money in his life anyway and that his agent told him to do it. Many hated him for that, but I loved it. His antics on the field were just as hilarious. While running down a fly ball to the warning track, Manny caught it while giving a fan a high five. He proceeded to continue the play and make an incredible throw to second to throw a runner out.
This is the definition of “Manny being Manny.” When fans talk about how players should play just for the love of the game, this is exactly what they're talking about. Ignore the public relations, cliches and sometimes even the rules of the sport. Just get out there and have fun. While I will never praise Manny for cheating (twice), I will say that it doesn't ruin the image I have of him. Frankly, I don't care if he cheated. I love Manny because he loves playing baseball. To hell with everything else.
I'll end by saying this: I wonder what the sports world would be like if everyone played like Manny.
-Gus Rafeedie
Monday, April 4, 2011
Why College Athletes Should Stay In School [Mondays with Gus]
Every year, dozens of student athletes have to make the decision as to whether or not they should go pro or stay in school. Without getting into a debate on the value of a college education (and it's incredibly valuable on many levels), I can still put together an argument that it makes financial sense for them to stay in school. The assumption here is that the student athlete who decides to go pro will be a great player that lasts significantly longer than the average player, and that he will be able to demand a large salary.
In order to understand why this makes sense, you have to look at the two possible scenarios involved. In the first, you have a young player who spends a year or two trying to learn how the NBA works. He will have statistics that aren't impressive as they can be, mostly because the focus is, or at least should be, on learning rather than improving numbers. This time spent learning a new system and developing skills will be used against the player when the second contract is negotiated. This can easily cost a player millions of dollars, especially when you realize most contracts are fully guaranteed. In the second scenario, you have a player who comes in more polished, has better statistics through his first few years in the league and can command a higher salary due to a more impressive resume within the time period specified (usually around four years).
With scenario one, the player will have an extra year in the league while in scenario two the player will have a stronger argument for a big contract towards the end of his career. The amount of the second contract (let's say five years) should normally be a lot more than the salary earned through one year in the league, mostly because it's a higher pay for multiple years versus a higher salary in just one year.
While there are many players (LeBron, Kobe, KG) that have made a fortune through skipping school, my point here is that student athletes in general would benefit from developing their talents instead of jumping at the first chance to make money. If many of these kids are jumping ship because they think they will automatically make more money - because they will be able to work an extra year - they haven't analyzed everything properly. I hope these kids make the right choice and stay in school.
-Gus Rafeedie